The Decision Router
AI handles the signal. Humans make the call.
Every important signal detected. Analyzed. Routed to exactly the right person. No committees. No agendas. No waiting.
Routed Today
14
Awaiting Action
5
Resolved Today
11
Avg Resolution
4.2 hrs
Active Decision Queue
Decisions awaiting human judgment. Click to expand.
AI Analysis
Pattern indicates instructional misalignment, not student deficiency. 4 of 6 students are strong in related skills (cellular respiration, ATP synthesis). Section 1 covers the same topic with 92% proficiency.
Recommended Action
Review Section 3 instructional approach for membrane transport. Compare to Section 1 (92% proficiency on same topic).
Routed To
Dr. Kim (Biology Dept Chair)
Resolved Today
11 decisions resolved · Average resolution time: 19 minutes
| Signal | Resolved By | Time | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chem 101 Lab Section 4: safety protocol quiz scores dropped below 80% threshold | Dr. Patel (Chem Chair) | 12 min | Mandatory safety review session added before next lab |
| Advising: 23 undeclared sophomores have not met with advisor this semester | Dir. Thompson (Advising) | 18 min | Triggered automated scheduling outreach with follow-up |
| Math 200: homework completion rate dropped 30% after midterm | Dr. Chen (Instructor) | 8 min | Reduced assignment length, added checkpoint problems |
| Tutoring center: 40% increase in demand for organic chemistry — waitlist growing | Maria Santos (Tutoring Dir) | 25 min | Added 3 evening drop-in sessions, recruited 2 peer tutors |
| Transfer student cohort: 8 students missing prerequisite for registered spring courses | Registrar Office | 45 min | Flagged for advisor review, 6 approved for co-requisite model |
| Student wellness: dining hall swipe data shows 4 students skipping meals consistently | Dean of Students | 22 min | Confidential outreach initiated, connected to food assistance |
| Physics 150: online practice system usage at 0 for 31 students after week 4 | Dr. Okafor (Instructor) | 15 min | In-class walkthrough of system, reset student access |
| English 102: 3 students flagged for potential academic integrity concern | Prof. Davis (Instructor) | 1.5 hr | Individual meetings scheduled, reviewed AI usage policy |
| Residence life: noise complaints up 200% in Hall B during finals prep week | RD Martinez | 30 min | Opened 24-hour quiet study space in Hall B lounge |
| Career services: employer info session has 3 RSVPs (expected 40) | Dir. Williams (Career Svcs) | 20 min | Pushed targeted notification to relevant majors, added pizza |
| IT: LMS response time exceeded 5s threshold during peak hours | CTO Office | 6 min | Scaled cloud resources, scheduled off-peak maintenance |
Academic Standards Committee
Members
All must attend. All must be available.
Monthly meeting
2-hour agenda. If you miss it, wait 30 days.
Items discussed
2 decisions made. 4 tabled for next month.
Average time from signal to action
Students don’t have 34 days.
28 faculty-hours per meeting. 12 meetings per year. 336 hours of committee time. For an average of 24 decisions per year.
Intelligent Decision Routing
Decisions routed today
Not per month. Per day.
Average time to resolution
Not 34 days. Hours.
Meetings required
Zero agendas. Zero scheduling conflicts.
Faculty hours wasted
Each person sees only the decisions they can act on.
The right person. The right signal. The right time. No more asking 14 people to sit in a room and discuss something only 1 of them can act on.
Governance Layer
Every routed decision passes through four gates before reaching a human. No exceptions.
Fairness Audit
Every recommendation checked for demographic bias. No action disproportionately affects any group.
Confidence Threshold
AI must exceed 80% confidence before routing. Below threshold = flagged for manual review.
Privacy Constraint
Student-identifiable data only visible to authorized roles. All routing respects FERPA.
Human Override Required
The AI never acts. It recommends. A human must approve, modify, or reject every decision.
The AI never acts. It recommends. Humans decide.
Every recommendation includes a confidence score, a fairness audit, a privacy check, and a mandatory human approval step. If any gate fails, the decision is flagged for manual review before routing.